Resource

Avoiding Avoidance

December 2012

The UK government is slashing spending on vital public services and welfare, increasing poverty and inequality. At a time when vulnerable people are bearing the brunt of the cuts, the UK government is making it easier for multinational companies to cut their tax bills.

Every year the UK government loses out on £25 billion in revenue to tax avoidance by large companies and rich individuals. These tax dodgers act as giant parasites, sucking profits out and leaving the rest of society paying the price.

David Cameron and George Osborne have been talking tough on tax. But rather than making it harder for companies to avoid tax, this year the government is proposing new changes which would give a green light to companies to avoid paying billions in tax. The government’s plans wouldn’t even stop high profile corporate tax dodgers like Amazon, Google and Starbucks, the Student Loans Company, the BBC, the civil service, Jimmy Carr or Take That.

Our report, Avoiding Avoidance, shows that the government’s plans for new tax rules in the 2013 Budget defines tax avoidance so narrowly that it would widen perceptions of what is acceptable, giving a green light to companies to avoid tax. Instead we are calling for the introduction of a General Anti-Avoidance Principle that could recover £5.5 billion of the tax that is currently avoided each year.

The government has already changed the UK’s tax laws to make it easier for companies to shift profits through tax havens in an enormous tax giveaway to some of the UK’s largest companies. The changes in the Budget in 2012 watered down the UK’s anti-tax haven (or Controlled Foreign Company) rules, so that the UK’s tax rules no longer deter companies from using tax havens. This move alone is set to lose the UK government £1 billion a year, and developing countries £4 billion a year.

The government claims they are making tackling tax avoidance one of their top priorities. Instead they are building a tax system where only the little people pay.

 

 

 

Avoiding Avoidance UPDATE - 21-01-13.pdf

Latest news

BDS is a legitimate means of protest against human rights abuse, says War on Want

14 December 2017 - 12:15pm

Campaigning for BDS is a legitimate means of protest, a fact that has been affirmed time and time again by bodies such as the European Union. It’s effectiveness is one of the main reasons why there is an organised campaign led by the Israeli government to shut it down. Students have every right to use their democratic rights to organise and exercise freedom of expression, and should be applauded for calling out violations of international law and human rights abuse.

Read more

Was it too much to expect the WTO to deliver for women?

14 December 2017 - 12:00pm

Argentina, host for this week’s World Trade Organisation, welcomed hundreds of government representatives to Buenos Aires to negotiate the rules of the global trade in goods, services and ecommerce. Lagging far behind other international fora, the WTO made attempts to draw attention to the impact of trade on gender equality, and correspondingly the impact women’s economic productivity can have on trade.

Read more

Join the conversation

Get War on Want materials for your #union, #campaign or #protest. We'll send you FREE publications and merch:… https://t.co/oKt06npIzn 7 hours 43 min ago
Was it too much to hope the #WTO would deliver for #women? War on Want asks: https://t.co/kXHmd0SUrH https://t.co/Onm5oGPOVk 10 hours 44 min ago
A significant victory for campaigners against the Government's HostileEnvironment. Everyone should be entitled to e… https://t.co/D2eO54lISp 11 hours 27 min ago